I'm not a Dodgers fan. When the Pittsburgh Pirates beat them three straight games, shutting them out twice, I was elated. I made sure to watch the replay of the last inning when Baltimore came back from several runs down to beat them in the ninth.
But there was no way to ignore the magic place they were in for the National League championship series. Suddenly healthy and focused, with all of their expensive plans and strategies for winning postseason series working like clockwork, they were something to see.
The Dodgers beat the Brewers, with the most regular season wins, in four games. They did it mostly with their starting pitching. And they needed to, because they weren't hitting so much. In particular, their spark plug Shohei Ohtani was in a conspicuous slump, seemingly flailing away at pitches all over the place.
That was the first three games. Being up 3 games to none with Ohtani in a slump is saying something. What would happen when he broke out of it?
That turned out to be the fourth game, which some are already saying was the best baseball game ever played, and Ohtani the best to ever play the game.
He was amazing. First of all, because he was the Dodgers' starting pitcher. Yeah, Ohtani was their fourth starter. The Dodgers are loaded.
He walked a batter in the first, but he also struck out the side. After his third strikeout he didn't even sit down for a second--he just exchanged equipment and got in the batter's box. I've questioned the strategy of having him hit lead-off, but to do it when he is also pitching seemed like managerial madness.
This time it worked. He hit a long home run and the Dodgers were up a run, and they went on from there. Ohtani would go on to strike out 10, and give up no runs in 6 plus innings. He would also hit two more home runs, including one to center that left Dodger stadium completely.
It was an historic performance. Ohtani has been unique in both pitching and hitting at a high level, and in this, the game Friday was a culmination. But the best to ever play the game? It's too soon and too easy to make that determination.
He is a hell of a pitcher, but unlike most starters, he had a lot of time off, and hasn't beat himself up pitching much over the past two seasons. He is a hell of a hitter, and he did hit those three home runs off three different pitches by three different pitchers, to three fields. That's extraordinarily impressive.
But he hit all three on pitches thrown exactly into his wheelhouse, low in the strike zone. He hit at least two of them on a 3-2 count. And none of them were in crucial situations--there was no pressure. Except for the first one in the first inning, the Dodgers were ahead and never really threatened (thanks largely of course to Ohtani's pitching). All three homers came with no one on base.
Those may be quibbles but baseball is full of subtle differences. He may be the best contemporary player and may turn out to be the best all time. But has he truly been tested, as others have been? Has he repeatedly made the crucial difference?
As for the game--no, it was not the greatest ever played. There was never any drama, and the stakes were only moderate. The Dodgers were up 3 games to none, they could have lost this game and still easily won the series. Compare this to say, the 7th game of the 1960 World Series in Pittsburgh, and there's really no contest.
No comments:
Post a Comment